ABXFoundation
Kebbi State · Ministry of Agriculture · 2025

For every ₦100 Kebbi set aside for agriculture, was spent.

Nobody has yet checked how much of that reached a farm. ABX Foundation follows agriculture money in Nigerian states from the budget line to the field, so that a budget stays a promise someone has to keep.

Every dotted figure is a receipt. Tap it to see the document, the page, the exact words and the arithmetic.

Follow ₦100 of Kebbi's agriculture budget

1 coin = ₦1
spentbudgeted, not spentcut during the yearnot published or not verified
Stage 1 of 5
Allocated, all statesof combined 2026 state and FCT budgets go to agriculture. The Kampala commitment is of spending.
Capital actually spentaverage state implementation of agriculture capital budgets, 2023 to 2025.
Very low performersstates recorded very low agriculture capital spending in 2025.
Reports publishedstates publish a quarterly budget report. The data exists. Nobody reads the agriculture lines systematically.
The leak map

A budget is approved once. It can fail in four places after that.

Most advocacy stops when the budget is passed. That is when governments find it easiest to agree, and easiest to quietly undo during the year. Tap each stage to see who controls it, which document shows it, and the question to ask.

Three pilot states

Two states that publish, one that mostly does not

Kebbi and Kaduna share first place on BudgIT's Q2 2026 fiscal transparency league. Nasarawa is 35th of 36. Comparing them shows what transparency does, and does not, tell you about whether money arrives.

Where Kebbi's 21% sits

Share of each unit's revised 2025 budget that was spent. Dashed line: whole state, .

Almost the whole ministry budget sits on the headquarters line, and that line spent . The small agencies spent more, of much smaller sums.

Citizens' Budget ✓Quarterly report ✓e-Procurement ✓Fiscal data site ✓

Kebbi moved from 11th to joint first on BudgIT's league between Q1 and Q2 2026 ().

The ministry's budget was cut by , or of the original. The report's own text puts the cut at . Whole-state spending reached , with capital at and recurrent at .

Not in the report: releases. ABX has also not yet read the capital-only tables. Both are needed before Kebbi can be scored.

Against the Kampala 10%

Kebbi looks like a leader on paper, and spends like a laggard

The Kampala CAADP Declaration commits governments to at least 10% of annual public expenditure on agrifood systems. Allocation alone flatters states that budget big and spend small.

approved or proposedrevisedactually spentKampala 10%

Read across with care. Kebbi is measured on its 2025 report and the ministry line only. Kaduna and Nasarawa are 2026 budget documents, and Nasarawa includes water. Kampala covers whole agrifood systems, wider than one ministry.

What ABX can score today

Even the best-disclosing state cannot be scored yet

The ABX Budget Execution Index has five parts. If two or more are missing, a state is "not assessable" and the missing documents are named. No score is guessed.

read from a documentpartly read or a proxynot publishednot yet assessed
Draft findings

What the documents already show

Each finding goes to the state for a 21-day right of reply before formal publication. The question is always why the money did not reach farmers, not who took it.

High

Kebbi's report disagrees with its own table about the size of the cut

Section 1.A says agriculture was cut by . Table 4 shows the ministry fell from to . The gap is .

High

Kebbi's agriculture ministry spends at half the state's pace

The ministry spent of its revised budget. The state as a whole spent . Agora Policy independently puts Kebbi's 2025 implementation at .

Medium

Kebbi revised its agriculture budget down by 40%

A budget credibility deviation means the original allocation was a weak guide to what the state intended to spend.

Medium

Almost none of Kebbi's agriculture spending appears in the last quarter

The parent line records in Q4, which is of the year's spending, in the months after harvest when dry-season inputs are bought.

Medium

No release data, so the real bottleneck is hidden

Without releases, nobody can tell whether the treasury held money back or the ministry could not spend what it got. Stakeholders name as a major cause.

Medium

Nasarawa cannot be read by a resident

No Citizens' Budget, no 2026 contracts on the procurement portal and uneven access to ministry pages ().

Take action

Evidence only matters if someone uses it, at the right moment

The same finding is worth far more six weeks before a budget defence than at a launch event. These tools are for the people who can turn ABX evidence into pressure.

Farmer groups

Plain-language scorecards, and a role in checking projects in your own communities.

Women farmers' networks

Evidence on whether extension and input programmes, where women farmers depend most on public support, are funded.

Journalists

Every figure arrives with its receipt, ready to cite and check.

State lawmakers

Pre-budget-defence packs for agriculture and appropriation committees, timed to your calendar.

Development partners

Counterpart-funding compliance and verified delivery data before you co-finance a state programme.

The budget calendar: when pressure works

A typical Nigerian state budget year. Exact dates vary by state; ABX will publish each state's real calendar. The current month is outlined. Tap any month.

executive stageHouse of Assembly stagequarterly report due

Ask your state: build an information request

This builds a draft in your browser. Nothing is sent or stored. It is a template, not legal advice: the Freedom of Information Act 2011 applies plainly to federal bodies, and its reach over state bodies differs by state, so the letter also cites the state's own law and the Constitution.

Verified delivery

Four tests. Pass all four or it does not count.

Spending is not delivery. Trained members of farmer organisations visit a random sample of each state's capital projects. Try the standard on the examples below. These are illustrations, not findings.

Method

How a number earns a place here

The full method is in the ABX Methodology Paper, published before any ranking and open for peer review. Anyone should be able to reproduce an ABX figure from the same public documents.

1

Capture

Record the document, page, and exact words or row. Nothing typed from memory.

2

Classify

Mark each figure reported or derived, and grade each state-year from A (audited) to E (unavailable).

3

Derive

Show the formula and inputs for every computed figure. Missing data is named, never estimated.

4

Reply

Send findings to the state 21 days before publishing. Publish the reply, or the silence.

Test the index yourself

Weights are a judgement. ABX publishes how rankings move when the weights change, so no state's rank rests on a hidden choice. Move the sliders. The three states are invented examples built to show the trade-offs.

Indicator table, three pilot states

IndicatorKebbiKadunaNasarawa
Allocation shareAgriculture budget ÷ total budgetoriginalrevised (scored)2026 approved2026 proposal, includes water
Expenditure shareAgriculture spent ÷ total spent: the Kampala testNot yet readNot yet read
Execution rateSpent ÷ revised budgetall spending typesNot yet readNot yet read
Budget credibility deviation|Revised − original| ÷ originalNot yet readNot yet read
Release rateReleased ÷ revised budgetNot publishedNot yet assessedNot yet assessed
Verified delivery rateProjects passing all four tests ÷ sampledNo field visit yetNo field visit yetNo field visit yet
Quality gradeA audited · C report only · D reconstructed · E unavailableCD for allocation; E for execution, because the work is not yet doneD; E for execution
Report clock

Third-quarter reports are due on 30 October

A quarterly budget report counts as on time if it is published within 30 days of quarter end. ABX logs when each state publishes, because late reports make in-year oversight impossible.

Q3 2026 reports due 30 Oct 2026—days left
KebbiLast report read: Q4 2025. Q3 2026 not yet logged.Watching
KadunaLatest reported: half-year 2025. None read in full.Watching
NasarawaBudgIT confirms a report exists. None read in full.Watching

An illustration of the live tracker. ABX has not yet checked any state's Q3 2026 report.

Partner with ABX

From three readable states to a national index

ABX is looking for three partners: an institution to peer-review the method, a farmer organisation with multi-state reach to co-lead field verification, and an anchor funder or fiscal sponsor for a 12-month pilot.

01Read

Extract every agriculture line from each pilot state's budgets and quarterly reports for 2023 to 2026, and replace press-sourced figures with the documents themselves.

02Ask

File information requests for releases and capital project detail, and publish each reply, or silence, beside the numbers it affects.

03Verify

With farmer organisation partners, visit a random sample of each state's capital agriculture projects and record whether they pass all four tests.

What this site already does

  • Built only from published documents, each linked with page and quote.
  • Shows what is missing, including in the best-disclosing state.
  • Ready to add states. Rivers is the purest low-disclosure case (); Nasarawa was chosen because its report can be read.

What it does not show yet

  • An index score for any state. None can be computed yet.
  • A finding a state has answered. Right of reply has not started.
  • Any record of releases or field delivery. Neither has been collected.
Sources

Everything cited, with links

Each source was opened on . Transparency scores are BudgIT's, reproduced unchanged under its CC BY-ND 3.0 licence.

    Reported